Credit decision for Alaskan Bears

Well, it seems that credit crunch for the bears in Alaska might occur somewhere, as one might conventionally think sometime in late winter early spring, or maybe late spring when physical activity is at a lull and the housing premium has already passed, the bear loans of course occurred in summer, that is when energies futures were amassed in potential stockpiles, sure, fighting might have occurred at the river banks at least for energies loan on certain commodities such as, you know, salmon. Of course, too many bears and too little too eat might represent trouble at such river banks and neither having enough river banks to go to well, merely strain on our bear populations that might find such unnerving (you might have thought I would be a total cornball and say unbearable but I'll spare you this). As I see it the bears foster a nice balance between equity and energies futures, usually, sometimes, between more dormant times and less dormant times. They might not over invest themselves beyond tried and true principles, a certain credit soundness from year to year that actuates their healthy lifestyle come next summer. Well you might ask did the river banks depend really on the bears? Well, in some way yes, maybe in terms of inter dependencies, maybe the salmon would be different without the bears, maybe life in and around the river bank not as good. It is an interactive investment after all at the bank. Isn't it?